The Truth About Islam - ඉස්ලාම් ගැන ඇත්ත

  I like it when a Muslim refers to me as "My friend." However, eve since I came to understand the general atmosphere of ignorance regarding Islam, I can't help but wonder, is this really what Islam itself teaches about non-Muslims? Let's see what the quran says about having non-muslim friends. Aal-e-Imran 3:28 Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliya (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allah in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allah warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allah is the final return. Hmm...That's not nice. It says Muslims aren't allowed to have non-Muslim friends unless they fear that not having such friends will endanger them. I wonder what Ibn Kathir, the greatest ever Quran commentator, had to say about this. Aal-e-Imran 3:28 English - Tafsir ibn kathir The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers  Allah says; Let not the belie...

  Now, we hear this from Muslims, don't we? "The Quran has been perfectly preserved right down to the letter ever since the time it was the prophet (PBUH)!" Okay, but is this claim backed up by authentic historical accounts of Islam? Let's find out. Let's see what two of the most authentic Islamic sources say about the perfect preservation of the Quran. As we read in Sahih Muslim, Hadith number 2286 : Abu Harb b. Abu al-Aswad reported on the authority of his father that Abu Musa al-Ash'ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur'an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara'at. I have, however, fo...

  According to the Aisha Bewley translation of Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith No 2442, Muhammad received revelations while in Aisha's garment. However, the same hadith in the Hilali - Khan translation says something else. "...Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the Divine Inspirations do not come to me on any of the BEDS except that of Aisha.." You can read the Hadith in the following link. https://sunnah.com/bukhari:2581 Now, we have a problem. Who was correct? Aisha Bewley, or Hilali and Khan? This can be solved easily, by using the Hilali - Khan translation itself. Here's how. The above linked site (ie sunnah.com) uses the Hilali - Khan translation. In that translation, in the linked hadith, the word for "ثوب" is "beds". However, in other Hadiths of the SAME translation, different forms of the word "ثوب" have been translated as different forms of the word "garments". The following link is the search result for the word "ثوب...

  We've been facing an issue that's at least somewhat related to Islam since sometime. That is, in short, some Muslims carrying out horrible violence in the name of Allah and other Muslims condemning such acts, also in the name of Allah. So, which Muslims are correct? Obviously, one group of Muslims are definitely wrong, but which one? Should we just blindly believe what peaceful Muslims say? If so, why shouldn't we equally blindly believe what violent Muslims say? Should we believe what the majority of Muslims say? If so, since the majority of any religious community usually don't follow the religion properly, why shouldn't we think that it's the minority of Muslims who actually practice their religion? In other words, why shouldn't we think that it's the minority of Muslims who murder, rape, torture, and destroy in the name of Allah that practice the religion properly? Saying "Well, if Islam was a bad religion, then so many people wouldn't be ...